ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
The Breast
Volume 15, Issue 3, June 2006, Pages 429-435
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (152 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.breast.2005.08.032    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

SHORT REPORT

Exemestane in metastatic breast cancer: Effective therapy after third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor failure

N. Steelea, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, J. Zekrib, R. Colemanb, R. Leonardc, K. Dunnb, A. Bowmana, I. Manifoldb, I. Kunklera, O. Purohitb and D. Camerona

aEdinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK bWeston Park Hospital, Whitham Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2SJ, UK cSouth West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, Sketty, Swansea SA2 8QA, UK

Received 18 April 2005; 
revised 13 July 2005; 
accepted 24 August 2005. 
Available online 19 October 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Summary

Exemestane is a potent steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) with activity in post-menopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, with a reported clinical benefit (CB) rate of 24.3% after prior AI therapy. Data on 114 patients (112 female, 2 male) were obtained retrospectively at two cancer centres. Sixty-five percent of patients were confirmed as oestrogen receptor (ER) positive. All patients had received prior third-generation AI therapy. Responses were seen in 5% and the overall CB rate (CR+PR+SDgreater-or-equal, slanted24 weeks) was 46%. Median PFS and OS were 18 and 61 weeks, respectively. In patients with visceral disease, the CBR was 33%. Patients with known ER-positive disease had a CBR of 47%, and a median TTP of 19 weeks. No benefit was seen in patients with known ER-negative disease. Survival was better in those with CB (median survival not reached in those with CB, 28 weeks in those without CB P<0.0001). Efficacy persisted in those patients who had received greater-or-equal, slanted3 prior lines of hormonal therapy, including adjuvant treatment. These data confirm exemestane to be an effective therapy after third-generation non-steroidal AI in post-menopausal ER-positive metastatic breast cancer, including visceral disease.

Keywords: Aromatase Inhibitor; Breast cancer; Exemestane

Article Outline

Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
References





The Breast
Volume 15, Issue 3, June 2006, Pages 429-435
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.